Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. PENA-RODRIGUEZ v. COLORADO

    trial on the ground that Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) generally prohibits a juror from testifying as ... challenges to the federal no-impeachment rule as applied to evidence of juror misconduct or bias. Held: Where ... to permit the trial court to consider the evidence of the juror’s statement and any resulting denial ...

  2. Edwards v. Aguillard

    theories as "the scientific evidences for [creation or evolution] and inferences from those scientific ... evidences." Appellees, who include Louisiana parents, teachers, and religious leaders, challenged the ... goal of "teaching all of the evidence." Forbidding the teaching of evolution when creation ...

  3. Edwards v. Aguillard

    theories as "the scientific evidences for [creation or evolution] and inferences from those scientific ... evidences." Appellees, who include Louisiana parents, teachers, and religious leaders, challenged the ... goal of "teaching all of the evidence." Forbidding the teaching of evolution when creation ...

  4. Edwards v. Aguillard

    theories as "the scientific evidences for [creation or evolution] and inferences from those scientific ... evidences." Appellees, who include Louisiana parents, teachers, and religious leaders, challenged the ... goal of "teaching all of the evidence." Forbidding the teaching of evolution when creation ...

  5. Edwards v. Aguillard

    theories as "the scientific evidences for [creation or evolution] and inferences from those scientific ... evidences." Appellees, who include Louisiana parents, teachers, and religious leaders, challenged the ... goal of "teaching all of the evidence." Forbidding the teaching of evolution when creation ...

  6. United States v. Leon

    other evidence. Respondents were indicted for federal drug offenses, and filed motions to suppress the ... evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. After an evidentiary hearing, the District Court granted the ... that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not apply where evidence is seized in reasonable, ...

  7. Norris v. Alabama

    the facts in order that the enforcement of the federal right may be assured. P. 590. 3. Evidence ... hearing the evidence, which we shall presently review, the trial judge denied both motions, and exception ... evidence, that examination must be made. Otherwise, review by this Court would fail of its purpose in ...

  8. Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. No. 12

    abuse its discretion in its rulings on the admissibility of evidence and objections to questions asked ... err in relying on evidence of the conduct in which the Party engaged prior to the enactment of the Act ... Court of Appeals having thrice examined the evidence adduced before the Board and having held that the ...

  9. Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. No. 12

    abuse its discretion in its rulings on the admissibility of evidence and objections to questions asked ... err in relying on evidence of the conduct in which the Party engaged prior to the enactment of the Act ... Court of Appeals having thrice examined the evidence adduced before the Board and having held that the ...

  10. HUSTED v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE

    removal and as the sole evidence for another ground for removal (e.g., as the sole evidence that someone ... return cards upon receipt that the failure to send cards back is worthless as evidence that an addressee ... failure to vote simply serve as evidence that a registrant has moved, not as the ground itself for ...

Pages