| PLILER V. FORD (03-221) 542 U.S. 225 (2004)
330 F.3d 1086, vacated and remanded. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus | Opinion [ Thomas ] | Concurrence [ O’Connor ] | Concurrence [ Stevens ] | Dissent [ Ginsburg ] | Dissent [ Breyer ] |
| HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN, PETITIONER
v.
RICHARD HERMAN FORD
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[June 21, 2004]
Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Souter joins, concurring in the judgment.
While I fully agree with the views expressed by Justice Ginsburg, post, p. 1, and Justice Breyer, post, p. 1 (dissenting opinions), I am persuaded that the judgment entered by the Court–remanding to the Ninth Circuit to determine the propriety of equitable tolling–is both consistent with those views and correct. I therefore concur in that judgment.