CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. ____ (2001).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Solid Waste Agency of No. Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001).

ORDER IN PENDING CASE

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

The petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for rehearing is denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

Wayne B. Hollingsworth, of Naples, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Wayne B. Hollingsworth is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Robert J. Elkins, of Sarasota, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert J. Elkins is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Mark Evan Frederick, of Destin, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Mark Evan Frederick is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Richard George Gomsrud, of St. Paul, Minnesota, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Richard George Gomsrud is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Robert A. Freeman, of Miami, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert A. Freeman is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Roger A. McKee, of Phoenix, Arizona, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Roger A. McKee is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Lewis Malamud Seagull, of Westfield, New Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Lewis Malamud Seagull is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Joseph Dee Morrissey, of Richmond, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Joseph Dee Morrissey is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Stephen Paul Rathjen, of Hauppauge, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Stephen Paul Rathjen is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Dennis Michael Barrett, of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Dennis Michael Barrett is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Paul McGee, of Atlanta, Georgia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Paul McGee is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Stephen D. Siegfried, of Hampton Bays, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Stephen D. Siegfried is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from today until Monday, June 25, 2001.