CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

in Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. ____ 2000. Therefore, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. ____ (2000).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. ____ (2000). ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted.

The motion of Texas, et al., for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument is granted.

argument is granted. The motion of respondents for divided argument is granted.

The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 4, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motion of petitioner to consolidate this case

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

Michael Anthony Conway, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 30, 2000, is discharged.