From the Legal Information Institute and Project Hermes
(ORDER LIST: 522 U.S.) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1997CERTIORARI GRANTED
97-156 BRAGDON, RANDON V. ABBOTT, SIDNEY, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 3 presented by the petition. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 6, 1998. Rule 29.2 does not apply.97-371 NEA, ET AL. V. FINLEY, KAREN, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of the Solicitor General is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before, 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 6, 1998. Rule 29.2 does not apply.97-428 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSN. V. MILLER, ROBERT, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel or or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 6, 1998. Rule 29.2 does not apply.97-581 PA BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE V. SCOTT, KEITH M.
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. In addition to this question, the parties are invited to brief and argue the following question: Must a search of a parolee's residence be based on reasonable suspicion to be valid under the Fourth Amendment where the parolee has consented to searches as a condition of his parole? The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. The brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 6, 1998. Rule 29.2 does not apply.