| Murphy v. Florida
(No. 74-5116)
___ |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus
| Opinion
[ Marshall ] | Concurrence
[ Burger ] | Dissent
[ Brennan ] |
| HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, concurring in the judgment.
I agree with MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN that the trial judge was woefully remiss in failing to insulate prospective jurors from the bizarre media coverage of this case [p804] and in not taking steps to prevent pretrial discussion of the case among them. Although I would not hesitate to reverse petitioner's conviction in the exercise of our supervisory powers were this a federal case, I agree with the Court that the circumstances of petitioner's trial did not rise to the level of a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.