Case Status
6 results
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 01/22/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted limited to the following questions: 1) Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by cable television systems that are simultaneously used to provide high-speed Internet access and conventional cable television programming. 2) Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by providers of wireless telecommunications services no less than to attachments by providers of wireline telecommunications services. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 02/20/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 02/20/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 02/20/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 02/20/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
NATL. CABLE TV ASSN., INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. (19576)
Order dated: 06/29/01Docket number: 00-832
Action:
argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
A description of the questions presented by the case has been prepared:
Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by cable television systems that are simultaneously used to provide high-speed Internet access and conventional cable television programming. 2. Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by providers of wireless telecommunications services. Consolidated with 00-843.
An opinion has been handed down: