Syllabus | Opinion [ Ginsburg ] | Dissent [ Scalia ] | Dissent [ Thomas ] |
---|---|---|---|
HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
WESLEY AARON SHAFER, Jr., PETITIONER
v. SOUTH CAROLINA
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA
[March 20, 2001]
Justice Scalia, dissenting.
While I concede that todays judgment is a logical extension of Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), I am more attached to the logic of the Constitution, whose Due Process Clause was understood as an embodiment
of common-law tradition, rather than as authority for federal courts to promulgate wise national rules of criminal procedure.
As I pointed out in Simmons, that common-law tradition does not contain special jury-instruction requirements for capital cases. Todays decision is the second page of the whole new chapter of our improvised