Georgia v. McCollum (91-372), 505 U.S. 42 (1992)
Syllabus
Concurrence
[ Rehnquist ]		Dissent
[ O'Connor ]		Concurrence
[ Thomas ]		Dissent
[ Scalia ]		Opinion
[ Blackmun ]
HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 91-372

GEORGIA, PETITIONER v. THOMAS McCOLLUM, WILLIAM JOSEPH McCOLLUM and ELLA HAMPTON McCOLLUM

on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of georgia

[June 18, 1992]

Chief Justice Rehnquist , concurring.

I was in dissent in Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., __ U. S. __ (1991), and continue to believe that case to have been wrongly decided. But so long as it remains the law, I believe that it controls the disposition of this case on the issue of "state action" under the Fourteenth Amendment. I therefore join the opinion of the Court.