Syllabus | Opinion [ Breyer ] | Concurrence [ O'Connor ] | Concurrence [ Thomas ] |
---|---|---|---|
HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
et al., PETITIONERS v. ALABAMA et al.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF ALABAMA
[March 23, 1999]
Justice OConnor, concurring.
I join the opinion of the Court, and I agree that the States failure to properly raise its challenge to our negative Commerce Clause jurisprudence supports a decision not to pass on the merits of this claim. Ante, at 10. I further note, however, that the State does nothing that would persuade me to reconsider or abandon our well-established body of negative Commerce Clause jurisprudence.